"QUACK" you say?

That person is a "quack"! How many times have we tossed that statement around? Has anyone ever asked "What is a QUACK?" Naturopaths most notably, have been the target for being called a quack. But, is that really true? Does the definition even apply to a naturopath or a Holistic practitioner or to anyone who prefers not to use an avenue of chemicals in their bodies in the name of healing? Lets define QUACK. Free dictionary-1. An untrained person who pretends to be a physician and dispenses medical advice and treatment. Britannica-disapproving : an unskillful doctor or a person who falsely claims to have medical skills. Quack is actually defined as an untrained person who practices medicine fraudulently (Naturopaths are not untrained and do not practice MEDICINE) Definition of Medicine- any substance or substances used to treat illness or disease by means of DRUGS, surgical operations or appliances. So if we apply the standard definition by mainstream dictionary to Naturopaths, its beliefs and practices cannot be quackery. Allopathic medicine uses drugs to treat, so the logical conclusion would be that the definition clearly cannot apply to Naturopathic doctors if they do not use toxic drugs in their practice and are not untrained. BEFORE surgery and synthetic isolation of chemical substances, foods, water, and whole herbs were used for a wide range of illnesses. The Chinese for example, used kelp to heal the thyroid and the Egyptians used liver for night blindness. Nature does not err when nature is not intervened by human hands. Unfortunately, the truth is, everything in nature has been manipulated and tainted. I cannot address a healthy, holistic approach without first and foremost acknowledging the most global covert human intervention of 75 plus years that is Engineering the weather aka climate engineering using nano particulates of heavy metals of Aluminum, Barium, Strontium, that has completely altered ALL of earths life support systems. Nature is no longer able to function as it was created to do, unless we fully disclose this direct assault against humanity. So if the definition of a "quack" has been misconstrued and recklessly applied, is it not reasonable to say that maybe we should question a lot of things? Why is such narratives and popular ideologies pushed and others criminalized? We are in an upside down world, we are inside/out and backwards. Quack!